Costel B.

My work focuses on formulating central theses from structural constraints rather than from narrative momentum. I am primarily interested in how limits imposed by regulation, capital, technology, and time shape outcomes more reliably than stated intentions. I work by identifying what is implicitly assumed within a system and examining where those assumptions become fragile under pressure. A text is considered complete only if its thesis can be tested against subsequent developments and revised or invalidated as conditions change.

I write in a deliberately compressed form and avoid explanatory scaffolding. Terms are not defined and arguments are not smoothed for accessibility or persuasion. Precision is favored over readability, and coherence over breadth. When writing collaboratively, I apply the same criteria to shared work, focusing on internal consistency and on whether a thesis continues to hold when assumptions, timelines, or external conditions shift.